Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Quoted from the wiki:Make sure that you own a R6xx (HD2xxx) or newer card or the driver won't be enabled. If you need to reset your password, click here. Along with the appropriate version of xorg-server. have a peek here
Log in / Register Ubuntufglrx-installer package Overview Code Bugs Blueprints Translations Answers 1002:9712 fglrx driver doesn't recognize my ATI RS880M Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series Bug #1068411 reported by Emiliano on Reload to refresh your session. UbuntuCommunityAsk!DeveloperDesignDiscourseHardwareInsightsJujuShopMore ›AppsHelpForumLaunchpadMAASCanonical current community chat Ask Ubuntu Ask Ubuntu Meta your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. No such device Next message: ATI driver installation - Error inserting fglrx...
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. I > wonder if this is possible yet in Ubuntu with X.org? > > On 1/18/06, Sean Hammond <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I think I understand now. Unless AMD's website, or an AMD representative notes how a card is or is not supported, the information you are quoting is, at best, conjecture. Go Here R600 is the chip used in the HD2000 cards:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R600_(ASIC)Here's the announcement by ATI:http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/w … iw_xp.aspxJust use the open source drivers.
I didn't see much point reading past this point. At the moment I see no evidence of a bug. Emiliano (pulgafree) wrote on 2012-10-21: #18 BTW, this is related to http://askubuntu.com/questions/203232/radeon-hd-2000-3000-4000-on-12-10-quantal-fglrx-legacy-12-6-unsupported-wh Christopher M. What to do?
just > sudo apt-get install xserver-xorg-driver-ati > sudp dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg > and when asked what driver, choose radeon, if its not already enabled If you'd like to contribute content, let us know. On 1/18/06, ulrich steffens <[hidden email]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2006, 13:00 +0000 schrieb Sean Hammond: > > It looks like I need to use the 'radeon' sub-driver from the I didn't fully understand your question.
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in. navigate here This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. I wonder if this is possible yet in Ubuntu with X.org? Edit Remove 66 This bug affects 14 people Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Edit Confirmed Undecided Unassigned Edit Also affects project (?) Also affects distribution/package Nominate for series
ulrich -- ulrich steffens ulrich at barfuss-jerusalem.org http://www.barfuss-jerusalem.org Previous message: ATI driver installation - Error inserting fglrx... If the ATI/AMD installer package works then the elrepo RPM package should work too.[/quote] The elrepo fglrx-legacy page; http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-fglrx-legacy [^] stated clearly that radeon 9550 is supported, and didn't mention which I'm assuming your 9550 as being later than "RADEON 8500" so I would expect this to support your device?? Check This Out I installed the RV630 compatible Catalystdriver from the official webpage.
Downloaded http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip and did: unzip to home directory sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb sudo aticonfig --initial -f But, as soon I do dpkg -i fglrx*.deb, a error José Carlos Madureira Junior (jcmadureyra) on 2012-10-20 Changed in fglrx-installer (Ubuntu): status: Incomplete → Confirmed Emiliano (pulgafree) wrote on 2012-10-20: #13 Update: Just a moment ago a new update for fglrx Is Certificate validation done completely local?
whenever I issue "sudo modprobe fglrx" command I get this output; "FATAL: Error inserting fglrx (/lib/modules/3.2.0-29-generic/updates/dkms/fglrx.ko): No such device". [/quote] It looks like you still have remnants of an old install This release of ati installer doesn't support either centos 5 or 6 only 4, and I'm not sure if I tried to create the centos 4 packages from the installer it I'm currently running Red Hat Enerprise Linux 5 on a desktop station. Duplicate of bug #1058040 Remove Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications.
Installed and the same problem. Thanks. I'm about to install an ATI FirePro 2460 graphical board. this contact form You are currently viewing LQ as a guest.
Could you be more specific on this penalty? I was hoping to get 3D performance as good as in Windows maybe. Offline #5 2012-04-21 01:31:27 trusktr Banned From: .earth Registered: 2010-02-18 Posts: 907 Website Re: [SOLVED] aticonfig: No supported adapters detected. wkentaro closed this Oct 10, 2015 Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub.
If you are able to supply a fix, even better. Christopher M. A simpler method would have been to press CTRL-BACKSPACE at the logon screen. No such device It looks like I need to use the 'radeon' sub-driver from the package xserver-xorg-driver-ati in order to get open source 3D acceleration.
You can access the above AMD driver by selecting the driver for an HD2000 series card, so I would suggest you download it and see if it works for you. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Closing log file. [email protected] - joe at true skater dot io.
No such device Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2006, 13:00 +0000 schrieb Sean Hammond: > It looks like I need to use the 'radeon' sub-driver from the package > xserver-xorg-driver-ati in order to Additional Information This is the xorg.conf file I used, I created it using "aticonfig --initial" on an older linux distro that isn't supported anymore: Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "aticonfig Layout" Screen 0 Error! What to do?
Doesn't the 'RS690M' in my 'lspci' output (the '690' in particular) correspond to the '6xx' in 'R6xx and above'?